SCO112: (Critical Reasoning) In Week 1 of the course, you will be given access to an online sign-up sheet for you to 1) form a debate group of not more than 5 members, 2) choose a debate motion, and 3) pair with another debate group to debate the motion.
Module / Subject / School:
SCO112: Critical Reasoning
Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS)
Requirements:Â
This Question Booklet contains one question comprising of two tasks.
Task 1: Topic Introduction
The prompts below guide your preparation for understanding the debate topic.
1. State succinctly one of these three concepts:
• Wokeness
• Cancel Culture
• Post-truth (5 marks)
2. Explain what the concept of your choice is about, taking care to explain in simple language all its essential aspects. (10 marks)
3. Identify how the concept of your choice is related to a real-life example of your choice. (10 marks)
The total number of words for Task 1 is 300, with a 10% buffer. It is up to you to allocate the number of words for each section.
One member of the group will post a group’s Task 1 answer on the discussion board, on the group’s behalf.
Every member of the group earns the same marks for Task 1.
Task 2: Staged Debate
Each group will be paired with a group who chose the same concept. Both groups will be given a debate motion relevant to their chosen concept one week before the posting of the staged debate on Canvas Discussions.
Each pair of groups is to decide which group argues for the motion and which group argues against the motion, and prepare for a staged debate on the motion by following the instructions for individual group members below:
1. Paraphrase researched arguments for or against the motion.
2. Evaluate the other group’s researched arguments for or against the motion. Each student has to present at least one argument and at least one objection.
3. Conclude from one’s arguments.
The maximum of 75 marks for satisfying the instructions are earned by individual group members through the rubrics below. The rubrics below also serve to assess individual students’ competency in a) interpreting data to uncover patterns and trends between various sources of data, and b) articulating ideas to persuade others.
Each debating group pairing will post their arguments on Canvas discussion boards within the regular seminar timeslot on Week 3. Postings after the timeslot duration will not be marked.
Each group member is allowed a discussion board post of 500 words, with a 10% buffer.
What we score:
80%
Our Writer’s CommentÂ
This assignment is designed to assess students’ understanding of business practices.
To secure an A+ grade, adhere to these guidelines and make sure your work aligns with the grading criteria:
Task 1: Topic Introduction
1. Be Clear and Concise
For the first part, where you need to state one of the three concepts—Wokeness, Cancel Culture, or Post-truth—focus on being as clear and succinct as possible. You’ve only got 5 marks here, so make sure you’re getting straight to the point. Avoid any fluff and ensure that your definition is precise and captures the essence of the concept.
2. Simplify Without Oversimplifying
When explaining the concept in simple language, aim to break it down in a way that someone with no prior knowledge could understand. But be careful not to oversimplify—make sure you’re still covering all the essential aspects. Use examples or analogies if they help clarify the concept. This section is worth 10 marks, so make your explanation thorough yet accessible.
3. Make the Real-Life Example Relevant
Choosing a real-life example to illustrate the concept is where you can really shine. Pick an example that is current and well-known, which will make your argument more relatable and impactful. Ensure that you clearly explain the connection between the concept and the example, showing why this example is a good representation of the concept in action. This is worth another 10 marks, so it’s worth spending time finding a strong example and tying it back to your concept.
Task 2: Staged Debate
1. Paraphrase with Precision
When paraphrasing your researched arguments, make sure you’re doing more than just rewording the original text. Show that you’ve understood the arguments by presenting them clearly and concisely. Paraphrasing is an art—it’s about capturing the essence of the argument in your own words while maintaining its original meaning.
2. Evaluate with Depth
The evaluation part is where critical thinking comes into play. You need to dissect the other group’s arguments carefully. Look for any logical fallacies, weak points, or areas where their argument might lack evidence. When you present an objection, make sure it’s well-reasoned and supported by evidence. This part shows your ability to think critically and engage with opposing viewpoints.
3. Conclude Strongly
In your conclusion, tie everything together. Reinforce your main arguments and address why your position on the motion is the most compelling. A strong conclusion doesn’t just summarize what you’ve said but also leaves the reader with something to think about—a lingering question or a powerful statement that drives home your point.
General Tips for Both Tasks
1. Structure Your Work Clearly
A well-organized response is easier to follow and tends to score higher. Make sure each section of your response is clearly labeled, and the flow from one part to the next is logical. Good structure helps your reader see the progression of your argument.
2. Be Mindful of the Word Count
Both tasks have specific word limits with a 10% buffer. Use this to your advantage—don’t pad your answers, but also don’t leave out important points just to stay under the limit. Being concise yet comprehensive is key.
3. Engage with the Material
Show that you’re engaged with the material, not just going through the motions. If you’re passionate about your topic, let that come through in your writing. It can make your argument more persuasive and your analysis more insightful.
4. Reflect on Past Feedback
Look at the feedback you got for your 80% score. Were there specific areas where you could improve? Maybe your analysis wasn’t deep enough, or perhaps your arguments needed more evidence. Address these points in your next submission.
By focusing on these areas, you’re setting yourself up to not just meet the requirements but to exceed them.
Strong analysis, clear communication, and thoughtful engagement with the material will help you score even higher next time. You’ve got this!
Why are we trusted by Singaporean part-time students?
- Assurance of Academic Success: We are confident in the quality of our work so much so that we offer a 200% money-back guarantee if our work is not of sure-pass quality. This showcases our unwavering commitment to delivering exceptional essays that consistently meet the highest academic standards.
- Valuable Testimonials: We are proud to have received numerous testimonials from hundreds of satisfied students who have benefited from our services. These testimonials serve as a testament to the trust and satisfaction students place in our essay writing service. The positive feedback highlights the quality of our work and the positive impact we have had on our clients’ academic journeys.
- Well-Established and Trusted: With a decade of experience in the industry, we have built a strong and reputable presence. Our long-standing track record speaks to our ability to consistently deliver outstanding results. Students can have confidence in our extensive expertise and our proven ability to help bachelor and master’s students excel in their academic pursuits.
- Strict Confidentiality: We prioritize the confidentiality and privacy of our clients. Students can trust that their personal information and engagement with our service will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and security. We never disclose any client details to third parties.
Sample Assignment
We have done well for this piece, but are unfortunately unable to share with you. Why not have us work on a model assignment for you instead? You can know more about the service here.