POL357: (Good Governance and Anti-Corruption) Compare two countries/jurisdictions (excluding Singapore) on government effectiveness/regulatory quality and rule of law, and discuss two similarities and two differences in each of the two areas.

Module / Subject / School:

POL357: Good Governance and Anti-Corruption

Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS)

Requirements: 

Compare two countries/jurisdictions (excluding Singapore) on government effectiveness/regulatory quality and rule of law, and discuss two similarities and two differences in each of the two areas. Support your answer with relevant evidence and references to reports, surveys or studies from the countries/jurisdictions i, international organisations, non-governmental organisations, research bodies, academic and journal publications.

(20 marks)

What we score:

79%

Our Writer’s Comment 

Based on the assignment requirements provided, here are some comments to help students score well on this assignment:

Start by carefully selecting the two countries or jurisdictions you want to compare. Choose places that have clear differences and similarities in government effectiveness, regulatory quality, and rule of law—this will give you more to discuss.

Begin your comparison by briefly defining the key terms: government effectiveness, regulatory quality, and rule of law. Then, dive into the analysis. When discussing similarities, look for commonalities in how these countries manage their regulatory frameworks or uphold the rule of law. For instance, you might find that both countries have strong regulatory bodies that enforce laws effectively, or they may both suffer from similar challenges, like bureaucratic inefficiencies.

For differences, highlight contrasting aspects that stand out. Perhaps one country excels in government effectiveness due to a well-structured civil service, while the other struggles with corruption that undermines its regulatory quality. Or, one might have a robust rule of law due to strong legal institutions, whereas the other has issues with enforcement or judicial independence.

Support your analysis with evidence. Reference reports, surveys, or studies from reputable sources like the World Bank, Transparency International, or academic journals. This not only strengthens your argument but also shows that you’ve engaged with credible research, which is crucial for a higher score.

Finally, keep your writing clear and focused. Make sure each point you make is directly linked to the question and backed up with evidence.

Why are we trusted by Singaporean part-time students?

1. Assurance of Academic Success: We are confident in the quality of our work so much so that we offer a 200% money-back guarantee if our work is not of sure-pass quality. This showcases our unwavering commitment to delivering exceptional essays that consistently meet the highest academic standards.
2. Well-Established and Trusted: With a decade of experience in the industry, we have built a strong and reputable presence. Our long-standing track record speaks to our ability to consistently deliver outstanding results. Students can have confidence in our extensive expertise and our proven ability to help bachelor and master’s students excel in their academic pursuits.
3. Valuable Testimonials: We are proud to have received numerous testimonials from hundreds of satisfied students who have benefited from our services. These testimonials serve as a testament to the trust and satisfaction students place in our essay writing service. The positive feedback highlights the quality of our work and the positive impact we have had on our clients’ academic journeys.

Sample Assignment

While we have scored well for this assignment, we do not provide any sample assignment for this. If you’d like us to work on this, you can try our model assignment writing service.