NSG2HEL Assignment: Assessment 2

Module / Subject / School:

NSG2HEL: Assessment 2

La Trobe University

What we score:

85%

Requirements: 

This Assessment 2 requires you to accomplish a 1200-word assignment that answers two questions based on ONE of the two case studies.

Question 1: Identification of Ethical Issues

Identify the ethical issues in your chosen scenario. Provide a brief overview of the ethical principles and theory related to the scenario.

Question 2: Analysis of Ethical Issues

Undertake an analysis of the most relevant ethical principles and theory in relation to the scenario using appropriate literature.

Our Writer’s Comment 

Assessment 2 evaluates students’ ability to apply ethical theory and principles in depth to a single, complex clinical scenario, rather than compare cases or discuss ethics abstractly. Strong submissions demonstrate early clarity by clearly stating which case study is chosen and maintaining focus on that scenario throughout the essay.

A common weakness in Question 1 is identifying too many ethical principles without prioritisation. Higher-scoring essays briefly introduce several relevant principles (such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, veracity, and cultural sensitivity) but clearly indicate which principles are in tension and why this creates an ethical dilemma in the chosen case.

For Question 2, weaker submissions often describe ethical theories without applying them meaningfully to the patient’s situation. Stronger work uses ethical theory and contemporary literature to analyse competing obligations, demonstrating why certain ethical principles should take precedence in this specific context. Importantly, successful essays consistently return to the patient’s lived experience, family dynamics, and professional nursing responsibilities, rather than drifting into general discussion.

General Tips to Improve Your Score

• Choose one case study and commit to it
  Do not compare both scenarios; depth of analysis is prioritised over breadth.

• Keep the focus ethical, not legal
  Legal issues may be acknowledged briefly, but ethical reasoning must drive the analysis.

• Prioritise ethical principles clearly
  Explain which principles conflict and why one may ethically outweigh another.

• Apply theory directly to the patient’s situation
  Every ethical concept discussed should be linked back to the chosen case.

Need us to work on this assignment?

We can provide support for assignments that require deep ethical reasoning, careful literature use, and disciplined academic writing.

• Strong expertise in nursing ethics.
• Provision of strong scenario-based ethical analysis support.
• Singapore-based academic writing service since 2009
• 200% sure-pass money-back guarantee

Sample Assignment

We have done well for this piece, but are unfortunately unable to share it with you. Why not have us work on a model assignment for you instead? You can know more about the service here.