MENT3000: (Psychosocial for Complex Mental Health) You will need to come up with your own specific research question based on a chosen specific controversy

Module / Subject / School:

MENT3000: Psychosocial for Complex Mental Health

Curtin University

Requirements: 

Throughout the modules, we have discussed the importance of evidence-based practice and modules 1-4 introduced you to some of the core controversies and issues surrounding the sociocultural and temporal construction of psychopathology. You’re now going to extend your knowledge by completing a mini-integrative literature review. Before starting this assessment, you must watch the Literature Review assessment ilecture where the task is discussed in detail.

For this assessment, you will need to come up with your own specific research question based on a chosen specific controversy in the literature within one of the following two domains:

• A specific controversy surrounding diagnostic classification approaches to psychopathology; OR

• A specific controversy surrounding potential aetiologies of psychopathology. To see what an integrative review looks like please see this example. However, your Literature Review will look a bit different because it is smaller, does not require the same level of critical appraisal, and requires the specific content below. The things in bold below are main section headings for your paper. Please read each section below carefully to ascertain the required content and task.

• After your paper’s title, it starts with a short introduction paragraph. In APA 6th and 7th ed. formatting, the introduction paragraph is never labelled or given a heading such as “Introduction”. Your introduction should start with a hook sentence, then broadly introduce your paper’s main topic/theme and provide the context for the rest of the paper. The paragraph should conclude by outlining the specific topics/ideas your paper will discuss (e.g. “This paper first discusses… then examines…” etc.) so that your reader has a clear roadmap and signposts to navigate their way through your paper.

• Background

A brief introductory background to the controversy surrounding your chosen domain area and chosen research area. Be careful NOT to provide the specific answer to your controversy in this section. What is controversial about the area you’ve chosen to explore?

What is the broad dissent in the literature and why? This provides context to the review so your reader understands your paper’s specific context. This section should be naturally leading your reader to your research question (i.e. the research question shouldn’t come as a surprise to the reader).

Conclude this section with your Literature Review’s specific research question. You must use a PIO/PEO/SPIDER-type question or similar here. Remember that a question has a question mark at the end of it – it is not a statement. It is a question.

• Method

Open with your review’s inclusion and exclusion criteria for your literature searches and your rationale for these. Inclusion criteria are elements with your source literature that must be present to be included in the Evidence Synthesis section of your review, and exclusion criteria are things that would disqualify the source from inclusion. These will be highly dependent on your specific research question.

Describe and explain your search strategy including what literature databases and other sources you searched, and what your search terms were. This provides the reader with an overview of how you gathered your research for the review and the rationale for your choices. It should demonstrate that you’ve researched widely.

Include a PRISMA-type figure demonstrating the process and final outcome of your searches. See the example integrative review for what this should look like and use this as a guide to create yours. The PRISMA-type figure does not contribute to your word count.

• Evidence Synthesis

Open with a summary of the final number of sources included in your Evidence Synthesis section and their types (e.g. qualitative/ quantitative research studies, literature review articles, grey literature etc.). The only sources you are allowed to use in this section are the ones you’ve found via the specific search process described in your PRISMA/Method section. No other literature should be included in this section.

Synthesise your key findings into themes with sub-headings in order to answer your research question. This is where you’re critically summarising, analysing, evaluating and synthesising the thematic content within literature you’ve located. Don’t use a table here (the example integrative review does but this will exceed your word limit so don’t include this). Instead, discuss general themes under sub-headings relative to your chosen research question. What does the literature say in relation to your research question? What is the specific dissent in the literature re your question? You’ll need to be actively comparing and contrasting your literature here – i.e. it’s important not to only present one side of the debate in this section. Conclude this section with your answer to your research question.

• Own Practice Implications

Discuss the implications for your own practice. You’ll then need to specifically explain how you will translate and apply the results of your critical evaluation discussed in your paper to your own practice to ensure you are providing good quality care to people in your current and future practice. This section is about you – not other nurses/paramedics or students in general. You should use first person language in this section (i.e. “I…”). You must talk about yourself in this section. This content needs to go well beyond telling us that you’ll be aware or have knowledge about something – what specific things will you do to actively put your new awareness and knowledge into action and translate this knowledge into your own practice behaviours? Your application needs to be linked to the specific lessons learnt by engaging in your critical evaluation of the specific concepts you discussed in your paper. This is not a random application section where you just tell the reader how you are going to be a good, empathetic, person-centred, and compassionate nurse/paramedic when caring for people etc. Your application content must be specifically related to concepts and ideas you have previously discussed in your paper and how your own practice and behaviours will be specifically impacted to improve health outcomes. Even if you’re not planning to work in this area of care in future, consider how you might translate what you’ve learnt into other areas of care.

• Conclusion

A conclusion paragraph summarises the key themes and content within your paper as a whole.

What we score:

70%

Our Writer’s Comment 

This assignment is designed to assess students’ understanding of business practices.

To secure an A+ grade, adhere to these guidelines and make sure your work aligns with the grading criteria:

1. Introduction

You need to open with a strong hook to grab the reader’s attention, like a striking statistic or a statement highlighting the controversy in the literature. For example, if you’re discussing controversies in diagnostic classification, you could start with how different approaches (e.g., DSM vs. ICD) can lead to different diagnoses.

Make sure you clearly introduce the topic and set up the context for the reader. This should lead naturally into your research question, which should follow the PIO/PEO/SPIDER format. Your introduction should give the reader a roadmap, like:

• “This paper first explores the controversy surrounding diagnostic classification in mental health, then examines conflicting literature, and finally discusses the implications for practice.”

2. Background

This section is all about context. You’re building up to your research question by explaining the controversy in detail. Be sure to discuss the different perspectives within the literature—why is this topic controversial? Avoid giving an answer here—just set up the debate.

For instance, if you’re discussing the controversy around the aetiologies of psychopathology, you might explain how the biological vs. social models of mental health clash, without yet stating which is more valid. Then, lead your reader naturally to your research question:

• “Given these opposing views, this paper seeks to answer the question: What role does social context play in the development of mental health disorders?”

3. Method

This is where you need to demonstrate your research skills:

• Start by explaining your inclusion and exclusion criteria. For example, you might include only peer-reviewed articles from the last 10 years, excluding articles that don’t specifically address your research question.
• Discuss your search strategy: Which databases did you search (e.g., PubMed, PsycINFO)? What keywords did you use? Make sure the search strategy looks well thought out and logical.
• Include a PRISMA figure to show the search process. This is crucial for clarity and will help show the reader how you narrowed down your sources. It doesn’t count toward your word limit, so make sure it’s detailed.

4. Evidence Synthesis

This is the heart of your review—here, you’ll need to synthesize the literature you’ve found:

• Summarize how many studies you included and their types (e.g., qualitative, quantitative).
• Organize this section using themes and sub-headings. If you’re exploring the aetiologies of mental illness, for example, you might have sub-headings like “Biological Explanations” and “Sociocultural Explanations.”
• Make sure to compare and contrast the studies. Don’t just present one viewpoint—show where the literature conflicts and how different studies approach the controversy.
• Answer your research question at the end of this section based on the literature you’ve reviewed. This is where you draw your conclusion from the evidence.

5. Own Practice Implications

This section is key for your personal development and how you’ll apply what you’ve learned in the real world. Use first-person language and be specific:

• Discuss what actions you’ll take as a result of this review. For example, if you’ve learned that the social model of mental health has strong support, you might plan to incorporate more holistic assessments in your practice.
• Avoid generic statements like “I will be more empathetic.” Instead, focus on how your new knowledge will change your approach. You might say, “I will ensure I evaluate not just biological symptoms but also social stressors when assessing patients, as the literature shows that social context plays a crucial role in mental health.”

6. Conclusion

The conclusion should be concise and summarize your main points:

• Restate your research question and summarize how the evidence answered it.
• Briefly mention the implications for practice again and conclude with the importance of addressing this controversy in the wider mental health field.

Final Tips:

• Be clear and concise: With a tight word limit, every sentence should add value to your argument.
• Use high-quality sources: Make sure you’re using peer-reviewed articles and reliable data to strengthen your synthesis.
• Stay on topic: Stick closely to your research question and avoid tangents. Keep everything tied back to the central controversy you’re exploring.
• APA formatting: Ensure your references are properly cited in APA format and that your PRISMA diagram is clearly labeled.

Why are we trusted by Singaporean part-time students?

1. Assurance of Academic Success: We are confident in the quality of our work so much so that we offer a 200% money-back guarantee if our work is not of sure-pass quality. This showcases our unwavering commitment to delivering exceptional essays that consistently meet the highest academic standards.
2. Well-Established and Trusted: With a decade of experience in the industry, we have built a strong and reputable presence. Our long-standing track record speaks to our ability to consistently deliver outstanding results. Students can have confidence in our extensive expertise and our proven ability to help bachelor and master’s students excel in their academic pursuits.
3. Valuable Testimonials: We are proud to have received numerous testimonials from hundreds of satisfied students who have benefited from our services. These testimonials serve as a testament to the trust and satisfaction students place in our essay writing service. The positive feedback highlights the quality of our work and the positive impact we have had on our clients’ academic journeys.
4. High Ratings on Google: Our commitment to excellence is reflected in the positive ratings we consistently receive from students. With an impressive 4.6 rating on Google, students can rely on the feedback shared by others who have had successful experiences with our service. These positive reviews further reinforce the trust students can place in the quality of our work and the positive outcomes we deliver.
5. Strict Confidentiality: We prioritize the confidentiality and privacy of our clients. Students can trust that their personal information and engagement with our service will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and security. We never disclose any client details to third parties.

Sample Assignment

We have done well for this piece, but are unfortunately unable to share with you. Why not have us work on a model assignment for you instead? You can know more about the service here.