fbpx

JUST 1018 (Injustice and Alternative Justice Mechanisms): Assessment 3 Case Study

JUST 1018 (Injustice and Alternative Justice Mechanisms): Assessment 3 Case Study

Module / Subject / School

JUST 1018: Injustice and Alternative Justice Mechanisms
University of South Australia

Requirements

  • Assessment type: Case Study

  • Word count: 1800 words

Throughout the course we have seen examples of where the criminal justice system has created unjust outcomes, resulted in miscarriages of justice, and reproduced structural inequalities. In this assessment you will undertake a real-life case study that exemplifies these issues. You will analyse how the criminal justice system contributed to the injustice or inequality and you will consider how alternative justice mechanisms could have avoided the injustice, or could be used to remedy the injustice.

You must choose one of the following case studies to analyse:

  • Aboriginal Deaths in Custody – TJ Denis

  • Mental Health and Miscarriages of Justice – Andrew Mallard

  • Injustice and Victim/Survivors in Trials – Bruce Lehrmann case

In analysing the case, you must answer the following question:

  • How did the criminal justice system contribute to the injustice AND how could the injustice have been avoided or remedied?

What We Score

  • 86%

Writer’s Comment

This assignment tests your ability to critically interrogate the criminal justice system.

Common issues we see when marking this assessment include:

  • Descriptive case summaries: Students recount the case facts without analysing systemic injustice

  • Weak engagement with “alternative justice”: Alternatives are mentioned briefly rather than evaluated

  • Unclear key argument: Essays lack a strong, explicit thesis linking injustice to institutional failure

  • Surface-level critique: Structural inequality is acknowledged but not explained

High-scoring submissions present a clear causal link between criminal justice processes and injustice, then critically evaluate how alternative justice mechanisms could have prevented or remedied the harm.

General Tips to Improve Your Score for This Assignment

  • State your key argument early: Your introduction should clearly answer the core question

  • Analyse systems, not just actors: Focus on institutional practices, procedures, and power

  • Use alternative justice meaningfully: Explain how and why these mechanisms would work

  • Link injustice to inequality: Demonstrate how broader social or structural factors are reproduced

  • Maintain analytical balance: Critique the system while grounding claims in evidence

Why Students Work With Our Experts for JUST 1018

  • Strong critical framing: We help articulate injustice as a systemic issue

  • Clear argument development: Essays are structured around a defensible thesis

  • Effective use of alternative justice concepts: Restorative and alternative mechanisms are applied analytically

  • Alignment with marking criteria: Every section addresses what assessors are looking for

  • Proven outcomes: Students consistently achieve results above 80%

If you need help with this assignment, our team knows exactly how to handle this kind of thing.

 

side banner 1side banner 2

Join 1,000+ Singaporeans who have chosen us for model assignment papers in Singapore.

See why we are different