Evidence-Based Practice: Students are required to critically appraise one (1) article from the pool of research articles retrieved from your searches of the chosen topic for your group presentation.

Step 1: Understand the Purpose of Critical Appraisal

Start by clearly stating the purpose of your critical appraisal. This sets the tone for the entire assignment. Explain that the goal is to assess the quality of the research article to determine if it is robust and reliable enough to be included in your synthesis. This shows you understand that critical appraisal is about evaluating not just the findings, but how the study was conducted.

Step 2: Appraise Methodological Quality

The bulk of your assignment should focus on critically appraising the methodological quality of the article. Use a recognized appraisal tool, such as the CASP checklist, to guide your evaluation. Consider whether the study’s design (randomized control trial, cohort study, etc.) is appropriate for answering the research question. Assess if the sample size was sufficient, the measures used were reliable, and whether the study duration was adequate. Show that you’ve really dug into how the research was conducted, rather than just summarizing the article.

Step 3: Address Potential Bias

Next, examine the potential for bias. This could be in the way participants were selected, the way data was collected, or even how the results were analyzed. For instance, was there a risk of selection bias because participants weren’t randomized? Were there any conflicts of interest that could have influenced the findings? Show that you’re thinking critically about every aspect of the study’s design and execution.

Step 4: Identify Strengths and Limitations

This is where you can show your ability to evaluate both the positive and negative aspects of the study. Identify the strengths that enhance the article’s credibility—maybe it used a strong, reliable data collection method or had a large, diverse sample. But don’t shy away from pointing out limitations. If the sample was too small or the study didn’t control for key confounding factors, explain why that weakens the article’s findings. Balance your critique by being fair but honest.

Step 5: Decide Whether to Include or Exclude the Article

After appraising the article, make a clear recommendation about whether it should be included in your group’s synthesis. If there are areas where more information is needed, mention that too. Justify your decision explicitly, citing specific examples from the article that led you to your conclusion.

Step 6: Consider Applicability

Finally, address the applicability of the article. How relevant are the findings to your topic or real-world practice? For instance, if you’re studying a healthcare intervention, consider whether the study’s results are generalizable to other populations or settings. This helps show that you’re not just focusing on methodology but also thinking about the practical implications of the research.

Why are we trusted by Singaporean part-time students?