Essay: The National Security Law China imposed was considered as a violation of human rights and autonomy. On the other hand, some people believe it is beneficial to keep Hong Kong a safer place. Which view do you agree with?

Requirements: 

No. of words: 700

The National Security Law China imposed was considered as a violation of human rights and autonomy. On the other hand, some people believe it is beneficial to keep Hong Kong a safer place. Which view do you agree with?

What we score:

79%

Our Writer’s Comment 

This assignment is designed to assess students’ understanding of business practices.

To secure an A+ grade, adhere to these guidelines and make sure your work aligns with the grading criteria:

Step 1: Understand the Core of the Question

You’re being asked to weigh in on two perspectives:

1. The view that the National Security Law violates human rights and Hong Kong’s autonomy.
2. The view that the law is necessary to maintain safety and stability in Hong Kong.

Before you start writing, decide which side you agree with, but also prepare to acknowledge and engage with the opposing viewpoint.

Step 2: Structure Your Essay Clearly

With a 700-word limit, you’ll need to be concise and organized. Here’s a simple structure that can help:

1. Introduction (100-120 words):
   • Briefly introduce the National Security Law, explaining that it was implemented by China to address perceived security threats in Hong Kong.
   • Mention the two main perspectives on the issue: concerns over human rights and autonomy versus the perceived benefits of increased security.
   • Clearly state your position (whether you agree with the violation of human rights and autonomy or believe it’s beneficial for safety), and outline the key points you’ll discuss.
2. Body Paragraph 1: The Human Rights and Autonomy Argument (200-250 words):
   • Present the argument that the NSL violates human rights and undermines Hong Kong’s autonomy.
   • Discuss how the law has been seen as a violation of the “One Country, Two Systems” principle, which was supposed to protect Hong Kong’s political and legal independence until 2047.
   • You could mention specific freedoms that have been curtailed, such as freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and the rights of political activists and opposition figures.
   • Use examples from reports or incidents since the law’s implementation that demonstrate this point (e.g., arrests of pro-democracy activists).
   • Include references to international responses (e.g., statements from the United Nations or human rights organizations).
3. Body Paragraph 2: The Safety and Stability Argument (200-250 words):
   • Present the argument that the NSL is necessary for maintaining safety and stability in Hong Kong.
   • Explain the Chinese government’s perspective: that the law is needed to counter terrorism, secession, subversion, and collusion with foreign forces.
   • Some people argue that the 2019 protests in Hong Kong demonstrated the need for stricter laws to prevent violence and instability. Highlight the perspective that the law has helped restore order in Hong Kong, making it safer for residents.
   • Include any statistics or reports that show a decrease in public disturbances or improved public safety since the law’s implementation.
4. Body Paragraph 3: Your Analysis and Stance (200-250 words):
   • This is where you should make it clear which side you support and why.
   • If you agree with the view that the NSL violates human rights, explain why those rights are fundamental to a free society and why the cost of losing them is too high. You could argue that there are other ways to ensure security without undermining freedoms.
   • Alternatively, if you believe the law is necessary for safety, explain why security and stability are the foundations for a functioning society, and why some limitations on freedoms might be justified in this context.
   • Acknowledge the counterargument here. For instance, if you’re arguing that the NSL is harmful to rights, briefly acknowledge the perspective that security is important, but explain why you still believe the law goes too far.
5. Conclusion (80-100 words):
   • Sum up your argument by restating your position.
   • Briefly emphasize why you believe your stance is the most reasonable, considering both sides of the debate.
   • End with a forward-looking statement, such as a hope for a balance between security and rights or the importance of ongoing dialogue around the issue.

Step 3: Support Your Argument with Evidence

To strengthen your essay, you should back up your points with specific examples. For example:

• If you’re arguing that the law violates rights, you could refer to the arrest of pro-democracy activists, the closure of independent media outlets, or the exile of political leaders.
• If you’re arguing that the law improves safety, you might mention a reduction in violent protests or fewer clashes between demonstrators and police.

Since the assignment doesn’t require references, you don’t need to cite sources formally, but using specific events or statistics will make your argument more convincing.

Step 4: Use Balanced and Objective Language

Even though you’re taking a stance, you should aim to use balanced language throughout. Avoid overly emotional or biased statements. For example, instead of saying, “The NSL completely destroyed Hong Kong’s freedom,” you could say, “Many critics argue that the NSL has significantly reduced the level of political freedom in Hong Kong.”

Step 5: Proofread and Edit

Before submitting, make sure you proofread your essay for grammar, spelling, and clarity. Since it’s only 700 words, each sentence needs to add value, so be concise and avoid repetition.

Why are we trusted by Singaporean part-time students?

1. Guaranteed Academic Success: We are so confident in the quality of our work that we offer a 200% money-back guarantee if it does not meet sure-pass standards. This reflects our unwavering dedication to delivering essays that consistently adhere to the highest academic benchmarks.
2. Positive Feedback: We take pride in the numerous testimonials from hundreds of satisfied students who have benefited from our services. These testimonials are a strong testament to the trust and satisfaction our clients have in our essay writing service. The positive reviews underscore the quality of our work and the significant impact we have had on our clients’ academic success.
3. Absolute Privacy: We place the highest priority on our clients’ confidentiality and privacy. Students can be assured that their personal information and interactions with our service are handled with the utmost security and discretion. We never share client details with any third parties.

Sample Assignment

We have done well for this piece, but are unfortunately unable to share with you. Why not have us work on a model assignment for you instead? You can know more about the service here.