Commercial Law Assessment 2: Individual Assignment on Contract Law
Module / Subject / School:
Commercial Law
Kaplan Higher Education Academy
Requirements:Â
- Â Essay (1000 words +/- 10%).
Yusof works as a car salesman at Luxury Car Dealers. On 2nd January Kenny saw an advertisement of Luxury Car Dealers and telephones Yusof and asked if he could trade in his Range Rover. Yusof says that he is happy to accept Kenny’s car but he would need to inspect the car before the sale is finalised. Kenny visits Yusof the next day and say ‘it is yours for $ 185,000.’ Yusof examines the car and replies ‘I love it but $185,000 is too expensive for the Range Rover’. Yusof says he will buy the car for $135,000. Kenny claims that his car is in a perfect condition and $135,000 is too low for his car. Yusof says he need to speak to his employer before he accepts to buy the car for $185,000.
Yusof’s employer agrees to buy the car for $185,000. On 4th January Yusof sent a text message to Kenny stating that he would buy the car for $185,000 and will assume this is acceptable unless Kenny tells him otherwise.
On 3rd January Kenny met his friend Aisyah and he made an offer to sell his car to her for $185,000. On 5th January Kenny emailed Aisyah stating that he has found a buyer for his car. However, she replied stating that she agrees to buy Kenny’s car for $185,000.
Discuss, incorporating your understanding of contract law, the following:
a. Whether a contract was formed. If so, when was it formed and who were the contracting parties?
What we score:
75%
Our Writer’s CommentÂ
This assignment assesses whether students can apply core contract law principles to a fact-heavy scenario. The legal concepts involved are basic, but the execution is not. Success depends on reading carefully and analysing each interaction using legal doctrine.
Common issues arise when students fail to separate offers from counter-offers or presume an agreement. Silence or delayed communications may cause confusion, especially when texts and emails are involved. Another recurring issue is identifying the wrong contracting parties or stating conclusions without legal justification.
Hence, strong submissions stay disciplined. Each statement made by the parties must be supported by case law and tied back to the question of contract formation.
General Tips to Improve Your Score for This Assignment
A structured approach is essential for this assignment. More often than not, markers are looking for legal reasoning.
- Break the scenario into a clear timeline: Each date and conversation should be analysed separately to determine whether an offer, counter-offer, or acceptance exists.
- Apply the correct rules for communication: Different legal rules apply to face-to-face discussions, text messages, and emails. Mixing these up leads to incorrect conclusions.
- Support conclusions with authority: Relevant contract law cases should be used to justify arguments on acceptance, silence, and revocation.
- Answer the question directly: Conclude clearly on whether a contract was formed, when it was formed, and who the parties were.
- Also note that consistency and proper APA referencing make a measurable difference to final marks.
Need Us to Work on This Assignment?
We have been doing assignments like this for many years and consistently score above 75% for Commercial Law modules.
- We understand how markers assess offer and acceptance questions
- We apply correct contract law principles with relevant case support
- We structure answers exactly to marking rubrics
- We deliver plagiarism-free work with proper APA referencing
- We handle tight deadlines without compromising quality
Getting contract formation wrong affects the entire answer. Having an expert handle it removes that risk.
