Assignment: Students are required to critically appraise one (1) article from the pool of research articles retrieved from your searches of the chosen topic for your group presentation.
Requirements:
Students are required to critically appraise one (1) article from the pool of research articles retrieved from your searches of the chosen topic for your group presentation.
The following criteria should be included in your written assignment (Refer to the assignment rubrics for more details):
- Purpose of the critical appraisal.
- Critical appraisal of methodological quality.
- Appraise & determine the extent to which the paper has addressed the possibility of bias in its design, conduct and analysis.
What we score:
80%
Our Writer’s Comment
Step 1: State the Purpose of Your Critical Appraisal
Start your assignment by clearly stating the purpose of the critical appraisal. Explain that the goal is to assess the quality of the article, determine its validity, and identify any potential biases. This should be a brief section, but it sets the tone for the rest of your work by clarifying why you are critically appraising the article.
Step 2: Appraise the Methodological Quality
Next, dive into the methodological quality of the article. This is the core of your critical appraisal and will carry a lot of weight in your score. Evaluate how well the study was designed and conducted. Consider factors like:
- Research Design: Was the study a randomized controlled trial, observational study, or something else? Was the design appropriate for the research question?
- Sample Size and Selection: Were the participants randomly selected, or could there be selection bias? Was the sample size adequate to ensure reliable results?
- Data Collection Methods: How was the data collected? Were the tools and techniques used appropriate for the study’s objectives? For example, were surveys or tests validated and reliable?
- Analysis: Were the statistical methods used appropriate for the data? Discuss whether the analysis was thorough and if the results were interpreted correctly.
Be detailed and objective in your appraisal, pointing out both the strengths and weaknesses of the study’s methodology.
Step 3: Evaluate Potential Bias
This part is critical for demonstrating a deep understanding of the article. Bias can creep into a study at various stages, such as in the design, data collection, or analysis. Address the following:
- Design Bias: Was the study designed in a way that might have led to biased results? For example, if the study only included a specific type of participant, it could limit the generalizability of the findings.
- Conduct Bias: Were there any conflicts of interest that could have influenced how the study was conducted? Did the authors receive funding from a source that might bias the results?
- Analysis Bias: Consider whether the statistical analysis was appropriate and if the authors might have manipulated the data (consciously or unconsciously) to support their hypothesis.
Step 4: Provide a Balanced Conclusion
End your assignment with a balanced summary. Weigh the strengths of the study against its weaknesses and discuss whether the article provides valid, reliable evidence for the topic of your group presentation. Be fair in your critique, recognizing both positive aspects and areas for improvement.
Why are we trusted by Singaporean part-time students?
You can see our numerous reviews that customers have left for us since we started in 2010. With more than 10 years of experience, you can be sure that our model assignment services will be of great help to you.
Sample Assignment
We unfortunately cannot show the sample model assignment that we have done for this piece. If you’d like to have your own model assignment done by us, you can check us out here.
