6WBS0017 (SDL) and 6WBS0016 (ONL) Assignment 1: Leadership in the 21st century: A critical examination of the development of leadership to meet the needs of contemporary organisations

Module / Subject / School

6WBS0017 SDL / 6WBS0016 ONL
Leadership and Organisations
Singapore University of Social Sciences

Requirements

Report (1500 words ±10%)

You are tasked to create a report that includes:

The evolution of leadership including the main developments in relevant theoretical perspectives.
Analysis of three current business leaders of your choice that adopt differing leadership styles, discussing the benefits and limitations of these approaches.
Evaluation of which of the three leadership styles you feel is most suitable for the current business landscape and how this approach may be further developed to provide effective leadership in the modern workplace.

You are required to work individually for this assignment and complete each of the tasks listed below.

Task 1 The Development of Leadership (25%): Explore how leadership in organisations has evolved from an autocratic approach towards a more collaborative approach fostering greater teamwork, productivity, innovation and creativity.
Task 2 Analysis of three different leadership styles (30%): By conducting suitable research, explore the use of three different leadership styles adopted by current business leaders. You may select leaders that have been discussed in the module or those that you have a personal interest in.
Task 3 Evaluation of 21st Century Leadership (25%): Select one of the three approaches discussed in Task 2 and provide a justified rationale as to why this is the most suitable approach to leadership in modern organisations. Evaluate how this approach may be further developed to provide effective leadership in the modern workplace.

What We Score

Our Writer’s Comment

This assignment is a critical report that tests whether students understand how leadership has evolved and can evaluate relevance in today’s business environment.

Common issues we see include

Overly descriptive theory sections. Leadership models are explained without showing progression or critical comparison.
Weak leader analysis. Leaders are described biographically instead of being analysed through leadership theory.
Unjustified final evaluation. The selected leadership style is stated as “best” without a clear rationale or future development plan.

High-scoring reports demonstrate progression and judgement across all three tasks.

How to Perform Better for This Assignment

Markers reward critical thinking and coherence.

Show leadership evolution clearly. Link early autocratic models to contemporary collaborative approaches using theory.
Analyse leaders through theory. Every example must clearly demonstrate a leadership style.
Compare benefits and limitations honestly. Balanced analysis scores higher than one-sided praise.
Develop the chosen style further. Explain how it can be adapted to address complexity, diversity, and digital work environments.

Strong submissions read like critical business reports.

Want Our Experts to Handle This Assignment?

We have supported many SUSS students with leadership and organisational behaviour reports across multiple intakes.

We understand SUSS expectations. Reports are structured to match task weightings and marking focus.
We apply leadership theory accurately. Analysis goes beyond description and shows evaluation.
We select and analyse leaders strategically. Examples are relevant, current, and defensible.
We deliver consistent outcomes. Most students working with our team achieve above 70% on first submission.

If you want this leadership report written with critical depth and clear academic control, our experts can take care of it.