fbpx

PSYM221: (Introduction to Statistics)

PSYM221: (Introduction to Statistics)

Module / Subject / School:

PSYM221: Introduction to Statistics

Requirements: 

Question 1

A researcher named Sun is examining predictors of subjective health in daily life. 39 participants were tracked over a 2-week period using wearable devices and daily questionnaires. Sun averaged these data to produce a set of variables for each participant: 

  • subjective health (on a 1-100 scale where higher numbers indicate better subjective health), 
  • step count (average number of steps per day),
  • interactions with strangers (average number of interactions per day). Ethnicity (East Asian, South Asian, or European) was also recorded. 

Sun hypothesizes that participants with greater average step counts would report better average subjective health over the 2-week period.

  1. (15 marks) Test Sun’s hypothesis using correlation analysis. Report the relevant statistical results in full, including whether a two-tailed or one-tailed t-test is most appropriate.
  1. (15 marks) Run a multiple regression model predicting subjective health from step count and interactions with strangers. What proportion of the variance in subjective health is explained by variance in step count and interactions with strangers combined? Report an appropriate model fit statistic to answer this question.
  1. (10 marks) Based on your regression model in Question 1b, which of the two predictors shows the strongest association with the DV? Explain how you obtained this information.
  1. (10 marks) For the model in Question 1b, Sun then tests the assumption of normality of residuals and concludes that this assumption has been violated for this model. Why might Sun have come to this conclusion? Use an appropriate graph to support your answer.

What we score:

77%

Our Writer’s Comment 

This assignment is designed to assess students’ understanding of business practices.

To secure an A+ grade, adhere to these guidelines and make sure your work aligns with the grading criteria:

Question 1a: Correlation Analysis (15 marks)

Step 1: Test the hypothesis
Sun’s hypothesis is about the relationship between step count and subjective health. This is a perfect case for a correlation analysis since you want to see if there’s a statistical association between these two continuous variables.

  • You’ll likely be using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) because you’re working with continuous data. Run the correlation test to see if there is a significant relationship between step count and subjective health.
  • Don’t forget to determine whether a one-tailed or two-tailed test is more appropriate. Since Sun has a specific direction in mind (that step count is positively correlated with subjective health), you can justify using a one-tailed t-test. But if you’re unsure about the direction (whether it could go either way), a two-tailed test is safer.

Step 2: Report the results
Once you’ve run the test, you need to report the key values:

  • r (the correlation coefficient),
  • p-value (to determine significance),
  • and the test statistic (if applicable).

Be sure to mention whether the result supports Sun’s hypothesis or not based on the p-value (e.g., if p < 0.05, the result is significant).

Question 1b: Multiple Regression Model (15 marks)

Here, you’re running a multiple regression analysis to predict subjective health using step count and interactions with strangers as predictors. The key here is to understand the proportion of variance explained by these predictors.

Step 1: Run the regression

  • Enter both step count and interactions with strangers as predictors.
  • Look at the R² value. This tells you the proportion of the variance in subjective health that’s explained by the two predictors combined.

Step 2: Report the model fit
Make sure you mention the R² value in your answer. This is important because it shows how much of the variability in subjective health can be predicted by the combined predictors.

For example: “The regression model explained R² = 0.45 of the variance in subjective health, indicating that step count and interactions with strangers together explain 45% of the variability in subjective health.”

Question 1c: Strongest Predictor (10 marks)

Now you want to figure out which of the two predictors (step count or interactions) has the strongest association with subjective health.

Step 1: Look at the beta coefficients (β)
The beta coefficient for each predictor tells you how strongly it’s associated with the dependent variable (subjective health). The predictor with the larger absolute beta value is the stronger predictor.

For example, if the beta for step count is larger than for interactions, you’d conclude that step count has the stronger association.

Step 2: Explain your answer
In your explanation, briefly mention the beta values and how they relate to the strength of the association. You might say something like: “The beta coefficient for step count (β = 0.6) is larger than that for interactions with strangers (β = 0.3), indicating that step count is the stronger predictor of subjective health.”

Question 1d: Normality of Residuals (10 marks)

For this part, Sun found that the assumption of normality of residuals was violated. This means that the errors in the regression model do not follow a normal distribution, which is a key assumption in linear regression.

Step 1: Why might Sun have concluded this?
The normality of residuals is typically tested using a histogram or a Q-Q plot. If Sun saw a skewed distribution or outliers in these plots, it would indicate that the residuals are not normally distributed. Sun could also use a Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, which would provide statistical evidence of this violation.

Step 2: Use a graph to support your answer
Include a Q-Q plot or a histogram of the residuals to visually demonstrate whether they deviate from normality. If the points on the Q-Q plot deviate significantly from the straight line, this would indicate non-normality.

In your explanation, write something like: “The Q-Q plot showed significant deviations from the normal line, suggesting that the residuals were not normally distributed, which violates the assumption of normality in regression.”

Overall Tips for the Report:

  • Be clear and concise: Always explain your steps and results in simple terms. Avoid overly technical language unless it’s required.
  • Use evidence: Whether it’s the p-value, R², or beta coefficients, always support your answers with statistical results.
  • Visual aids: When required, use graphs or plots to demonstrate points clearly, especially for normality tests.

Why are we trusted by Singaporean part-time students?

  1. Assurance of Academic Success: We are confident in the quality of our work so much so that we offer a 200% money-back guarantee if our work is not of sure-pass quality. This showcases our unwavering commitment to delivering exceptional essays that consistently meet the highest academic standards.
  2. Well-Established and Trusted: With a decade of experience in the industry, we have built a strong and reputable presence. Our long-standing track record speaks to our ability to consistently deliver outstanding results. Students can have confidence in our extensive expertise and our proven ability to help bachelor and master’s students excel in their academic pursuits.
  3. Valuable Testimonials: We are proud to have received numerous testimonials from hundreds of satisfied students who have benefited from our services. These testimonials serve as a testament to the trust and satisfaction students place in our essay writing service. The positive feedback highlights the quality of our work and the positive impact we have had on our clients’ academic journeys.
  4. High Ratings on Google: Our commitment to excellence is reflected in the positive ratings we consistently receive from students. With an impressive 4.6 rating on Google, students can rely on the feedback shared by others who have had successful experiences with our service. These positive reviews further reinforce the trust students can place in the quality of our work and the positive outcomes we deliver.
  5. Strict Confidentiality: We prioritize the confidentiality and privacy of our clients. Students can trust that their personal information and engagement with our service will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and security. We never disclose any client details to third parties.

Sample Assignment

We have done well for this piece, but are unfortunately unable to share with you. Why not have us work on a model assignment for you instead? You can know more about the service here.

 

side banner 1side banner 2

Join 1,000+ Singaporeans who have chosen us for model assignment papers in Singapore.

See why we are different