PSY259 Assignment: Personality and Individual Differences (TMA01)
Module / Subject / School:
PSY259: Personality and Individual Differences (TMA01)
Singapore University of Social Sciences
What we score:
79%
Requirements:Â
This Tutor-Marked Assignment 01 (TMA01) requires you to create a table with a minimum of 450 words, and a 680-word essay.
Part A: minimum 450 words
- A draft article by Chai (2024a) landed in your inbox and your job as scientific editor for The Straits Times is to examine and enhance the article’s scientific credibility; its current form lacks theoretical citations and empirical support for its arguments.
- Demonstrate your knowledge of individual psychology in the following table as you apply theoretical citations as well as empirical research to support at least five opinions that
a) the author made, and/or
b) the professionals that she interviewed provided.
Part B: 680-word limit
- Chai, A. (2024b, August 3). As eldest daughters, we’re learning to recognise our wounds – but are still scared to speak up. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/life/style/viewpoint-aseldest-daughters-we-re-learning-to-recognise-our-wounds-but-are-still-scared-to-speak-up
- To make Chai’s paper more well-rounded, you add a segment focusing on an alternative perspective to her current content. For this segment, differentiate how Adler and Bandura would respectively argue about “endless self-criticism in pursuit of perfection” and the role of “nurture” in developing personality.
Our Writer’s CommentÂ
This TMA is demanding because it tests two distinct academic skills within one submission. Part A assesses scientific reasoning and editorial judgement, while Part B evaluates theoretical understanding and comparative analysis. Students who perform poorly often underestimate how different these skills are.
In Part A, a common weakness is treating the task as simple fact-checking. High-scoring submissions go further by reframing journalistic claims into academically defensible statements, supported by both theory and empirical evidence. Another frequent issue is weak integration, where theory and studies are cited but not clearly linked back to the original claim.
For Part B, weaker answers summarise Adler and Bandura separately. Stronger responses actively contrast their assumptions, showing how each theory would interpret perfectionism and nurture differently, rather than presenting parallel descriptions.
General Tips to Improve Your Score
Treat Part A as scientific editing, not summarising
Your goal is to strengthen credibility, not merely add citations.
Ensure tight theory–evidence alignment
Each empirical study should clearly support the specific theoretical claim you cite.
Be selective with opinions in Part A
Fewer, well-developed rows are stronger than many shallow ones.
Use Part B for comparison, not repetition
Highlight differences in how Adler and Bandura conceptualise personality development.
Need us to work on this assignment?
We can provide expert support for the editorial judgment, theory application, and empirical evaluation needed for this TMA01 assignment.
- Writers with expertise in psychology and theory application.
- Strong support for table construction, resource evaluation, and critical analysis.
- Singapore-based academic writing service since 2009
- 200% sure-pass money-back guarantee
Sample Assignment
We have done well for this piece, but are unfortunately unable to share it with you. Why not have us work on a model assignment for you instead? You can know more about the service here.
