HBC263: Review the article, “Call me by my English name” (2022, April 17), in order to develop a field study that explores the relationship between a cultural dimension and workplace  communication preferences in an industry/sector of your choice. Cross-cultural intelligence at the workplace assignment

Module / Subject / School:

HBC263 Cross-cultural intelligence at the workplace

Singapore University of Social Sciences

Requirements: 

Question 1

Review the article, “Call me by my English name” (2022, April 17), in order to develop a field study that explores the relationship between a cultural dimension and workplace  communication preferences in an industry/sector of your choice

Begin by reviewing the required reading.

Upon understanding the relevance of the article content to this module, design a field study using in-depth qualitative interviews with four interviewees from the same industry/sector (they needn’t be from the same company) who are in middle or top management positions. Your interview questions and their responses should assist you to explain the relationship between your interviewees’ cultural leaning and their preferences on how they like to be addressed at work and why.

Bear in mind that your literature review and its conceptual content should be coherent with your study, its research question(s), and your report of findings and implications. This assignment gives you free rein to choose a cultural dimension you are interested in (Chapter 1), to apply and discuss in relation to communication (Chapter 2) and managerial styles (Chapters 3 and 5).

Conduct a thorough literature review and write an introduction that will relate  your selected cultural dimension to underlying theories relevant to workplace behaviour when managing teams and subordinates. For instance, a research  question may look like, ‘the more collectivistic a manager, the more they prefer  subordinates to address them by their initials, and not by their job titles.’ So collectivistic Assistant Director Ang Mo Kio tells his reporters to call him MK  and not Dr Ang. In this example, the corresponding literature review will cover relevant theories, conceptual content, as well as empirical findings sourced from published books and academic journals, to support why this research question  is valid and worthy of further study in this ECA. (30 marks, 840 words)

After the method section, share your results and discuss your respondents’  cultural leaning on the said dimension, their workplace communication  preferences, and their workplace communication experiences. Ensure that your  discussion is integrated with your earlier segments of literature review, research  question, and method, to offer a smooth, eloquent investigation and analysis. (40 marks, 1,120 words)

Based on the content of the aforementioned report sections, identify real-world pitfalls and problems in order to propose suitable workplace communication ideas or guidelines that will promote effective cross-cultural communication in the workplace. Your recommendations should be coherent with the rest of your report body, and should be logical, and empirically supported against the context of your research question and field study. (30 marks, 840 words)

What we score:

75%

Our Writer’s Comment 

This assignment tests students on their understanding of the concepts.

To score well on this assignment, consider the following guidelines:

Question 1: You are required to review the article “Call me by my English name” and develop a field study that explores the relationship between a cultural dimension and workplace communication preferences in an industry/sector of your choice. The assignment has three parts:

Part 1 (30 marks, 840 words): Conduct a thorough literature review and write an introduction that relates your selected cultural dimension to underlying theories relevant to workplace behavior and managerial styles. Your research question should be based on the relationship between your interviewees’ cultural leaning and their preferences on how they like to be addressed at work. Support your research question with relevant theories, conceptual content, and empirical findings from published books and academic journals. Ensure coherence between your literature review, research question, and report of findings.

Part 2 (40 marks, 1,120 words): Share your field study results and discuss your respondents’ cultural leaning on the selected dimension, their workplace communication preferences, and their workplace communication experiences. Integrate your discussion with the earlier segments of literature review, research question, and methodology to provide a smooth and eloquent investigation and analysis.

Part 3 (30 marks, 840 words): Based on the content of the previous report sections, identify real-world pitfalls and problems and propose suitable workplace communication ideas or guidelines to promote effective cross-cultural communication. Ensure that your recommendations are logical, coherent with the rest of your report, and empirically supported within the context of your research question and field study.

To score well, conduct a thorough literature review and demonstrate a deep understanding of relevant theories and empirical findings. Make sure your research question is clear and aligned with the chosen cultural dimension. Present your findings and analysis in a coherent and integrated manner. Provide logical and empirically supported recommendations for promoting effective cross-cultural communication in the workplace. Follow the word limits for each section and ensure that your writing is concise, clear, and well-structured.

Why are we trusted by Singaporean part-time students?

1. Assurance of Academic Success: We are confident in the quality of our work so much so that we offer a 200% money-back guarantee if our work is not of sure-pass quality. This showcases our unwavering commitment to delivering exceptional essays that consistently meet the highest academic standards.
2. Well-Established and Trusted: With a decade of experience in the industry, we have built a strong and reputable presence. Our long-standing track record speaks to our ability to consistently deliver outstanding results. Students can have confidence in our extensive expertise and our proven ability to help bachelor and master’s students excel in their academic pursuits.
3. Valuable Testimonials: We are proud to have received numerous testimonials from hundreds of satisfied students who have benefited from our services. These testimonials serve as a testament to the trust and satisfaction students place in our essay writing service. The positive feedback highlights the quality of our work and the positive impact we have had on our clients’ academic journeys.
4. High Ratings on Google: Our commitment to excellence is reflected in the positive ratings we consistently receive from students. With an impressive 4.6 rating on Google, students can rely on the feedback shared by others who have had successful experiences with our service. These positive reviews further reinforce the trust students can place in the quality of our work and the positive outcomes we deliver.
5. Strict Confidentiality: We prioritize the confidentiality and privacy of our clients. Students can trust that their personal information and engagement with our service will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and security. We never disclose any client details to third parties.

Sample Assignment

While we have scored well for this assignment, we do not provide any sample assignment for this. If you’d like us to work on this, you can try our model assignment writing service.