Assessment: Advancing Practice Through Research

Requirements: 

• 1500w x 2 copies 
• Reminder that you are working on the Diabetes paper. You can access via libgen. 
• For Part 1, both writers previously did 1500w — which comprises the introduction and 1200w of the critique. You may see the outline below for where you start.

What we score:

79%

Our Writer’s Comment 

This assignment is designed to assess students’ understanding of business practices.

To secure an A+ grade, adhere to these guidelines and make sure your work aligns with the grading criteria:

Step 1: Review the First Half

Before you jump into writing, read through what has already been written by the previous writers. Since they’ve covered the introduction and 1,200 words of critique, make sure you understand what arguments and points they’ve already made. Your writing should continue the flow seamlessly, so it’s essential to keep the same tone and level of detail.

• Consistency: Keep your writing style and tone in line with what’s already there. If the first half uses a formal, academic tone, match that.
• Avoid repetition: Make sure you don’t repeat points already made. Instead, focus on what hasn’t been fully explored or critique new elements of the study.

Step 2: Focus on the Remaining Critique

Since 1,200 words of critique have already been written, your task is to build on that with the remaining analysis. The critique should focus on evaluating aspects of the study that haven’t been fully covered yet. Here are some areas to think about:

1. Statistical Analysis and Results

• Look at how the diabetes study analyzed its data. Did the researchers use appropriate statistical methods? Were the results statistically significant? Were p-values, confidence intervals, or effect sizes mentioned?
• Consider whether the analysis aligns with the study’s goals. Were the results presented clearly, and do they support the conclusions drawn?

2. Biases and Limitations

• Discuss any potential biases in the study. Did the authors acknowledge limitations, like sample size or selection bias? If not, point out any limitations you observe and explain how they could impact the study’s findings.
• Critique how well the authors handled these limitations. For example, if the study had a small sample size, did they explain how this might limit generalizability?

3. Ethical Considerations

• If the first half didn’t cover ethical issues, this is an important section to address. Discuss how the study dealt with ethical aspects, such as informed consent, patient confidentiality, and minimizing harm to participants.
• If there were any ethical concerns, critique how they were handled and whether the study could have done better in this area.

4. Applicability of the Study

• Think about how applicable the study’s findings are to broader populations. Are the results generalizable to different groups of people with diabetes? Could the intervention tested be implemented in real-world settings?
• Discuss the external validity of the study. For example, if the study was conducted on a specific population (e.g., a particular age group or demographic), mention whether the findings could be extended to other populations.

5. Reliability and Validity

• Examine whether the study’s findings are reliable and valid. Reliability refers to whether the results could be replicated in other studies, and validity is about whether the study truly measures what it claims to measure.
• Look into the tools and methods used to assess diabetes control. Were they reliable, and did they accurately capture the outcomes the study was investigating?

Step 3: Maintain a Clear Structure

Since you’re building on what’s already been written, it’s important to keep a clear and organized structure. Here’s a general outline for the second half:

1. Transition (Short Paragraph): Start with a brief transition from the first half to introduce what you’ll cover next. You could say something like, “Building on the previous critique, this section will focus on the statistical analysis, potential biases, and the applicability of the study’s findings.”
2. Statistical Analysis (Around 300-400 Words): Critique how the study handled data analysis. Were the results presented clearly and accurately? Did the researchers use appropriate statistical methods, and were their conclusions supported by the data?
3. Biases and Limitations (Around 300 Words): Highlight any limitations in the study. Were there potential biases in participant selection or study design? Did the authors acknowledge these limitations, and how might they have impacted the results?
4. Ethical Considerations (Around 200-300 Words): Assess whether the study adhered to ethical guidelines. Were participants properly informed, and were any ethical concerns adequately addressed?
5. Applicability and Validity (Around 300 Words): Discuss whether the study’s findings are applicable to other settings or populations. Critique the external validity and whether the results could be generalized beyond the study’s sample.

Step 4: Use Evidence and Citations

Make sure your critique is supported by relevant literature and evidence. Since you need to have 8-10 citations across the paper, aim to use at least a few more sources in this section. You can refer to articles that discuss best practices in statistical analysis, external validity, or ethical considerations in clinical research.

For example, if you’re critiquing the statistical methods used in the diabetes study, you could cite literature that explains the appropriate use of p-values or confidence intervals in medical research.

Step 5: Stay Within the Word Limit

Since you’re writing 1,500 words, be mindful of how much space you give to each section. You don’t want to go over the word limit, so keep your critique focused and avoid unnecessary detail. Each section should provide enough depth to demonstrate critical thinking but not drag on.

Why are we trusted by Singaporean part-time students?

1. Guaranteed Academic Success: We are so confident in the quality of our work that we offer a 200% money-back guarantee if it does not meet sure-pass standards. This reflects our unwavering dedication to delivering essays that consistently adhere to the highest academic benchmarks.
2. Positive Feedback: We take pride in the numerous testimonials from hundreds of satisfied students who have benefited from our services. These testimonials are a strong testament to the trust and satisfaction our clients have in our essay writing service. The positive reviews underscore the quality of our work and the significant impact we have had on our clients’ academic success.
3. Absolute Privacy: We place the highest priority on our clients’ confidentiality and privacy. Students can be assured that their personal information and interactions with our service are handled with the utmost security and discretion. We never share client details with any third parties.

Sample Assignment

We have done well for this piece, but are unfortunately unable to share with you. Why not have us work on a model assignment for you instead? You can know more about the service here.